UGMS Criteria on Audit Findings
Key concepts cited from UGMS (below):
- Summary schedule
- Corrective action plan
- Fiscal year reference to each audit recommendation
- Reference numbers for each recommendation
- Listing of current and prior year recommendations if not implemented
- Partial corrective action (if any)
- Recommendation still valid (Y/N?)
- Contact names of responsible officials
- Anticipated completion date
- Comments or reasons if disagreement, or if no corrective action
plan required
Compliance with UGMS is required by grant contract.
Source:
UGMS:
http://governor.state.tx.us/files/state-grants/UGMS062004.doc
sec.___.315 Audit findings follow-up.
(a) General. The auditee is responsible for follow-up and corrective
action on all audit findings. As part of this responsibility, the
auditee shall prepare a summary schedule of prior audit findings.
The auditee shall also prepare a corrective action plan for current
year audit findings. The summary schedule of prior audit findings
and the corrective action plan shall include the reference numbers
the auditor assigns to audit findings under sec.___.510(c). Since
the summary schedule may include audit findings from multiple years,
it shall include the fiscal year in which the finding initially
occurred.
(b) Summary schedule of prior audit findings. The summary schedule
of prior audit findings shall report the status of all audit findings
included in the prior audit's schedule of findings and questioned
costs relative to state awards. The summary schedule shall also
include audit findings reported in the prior audit's summary schedule
of prior audit findings except audit findings listed as corrected
in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section, or no longer
valid or not warranting further action in accordance with paragraph
(b)(4) of this section.<
(1) When audit findings were fully corrected, the summary schedule
need only list the audit findings and state that corrective action
was taken.
(2) When audit findings were not corrected or were only partially
corrected, the summary schedule shall describe the planned corrective
action as well as any partial corrective action taken.
(3) When corrective action taken is significantly different
from corrective action previously reported in a corrective action
plan or in the state agency's or pass-through entity's management
decision, the summary schedule shall provide an explanation.
(4) When the auditee believes the audit findings are no longer
valid or do not warrant further action, the reasons for this position
shall be described in the summary schedule. A valid reason for
considering an audit finding as not warranting further action
is that all of the following have occurred:
(i) Two years have passed since the audit report in which
the finding occurred was submitted to the state coordinating
or oversight agency for single audit, state awarding
agency, or
pass-through entity;
(ii) The state coordinating or oversight agency for
single audit, the state awarding agency, or pass-through
entity is not currently following up with the auditee on the
audit finding; and
(iii) A management decision was not issued.
(c) Corrective action plan. At the completion of the audit, the
auditee shall prepare a corrective action plan to address each
audit finding included in the current year auditor's reports.
The corrective action plan shall provide the name(s) of the contact
person(s) responsible for corrective action, the corrective action
planned, and the anticipated completion date. If the auditee does
not agree with the audit findings or believes corrective action
is not required, then the corrective action plan shall include
an explanation and specific reasons.
|