Part
1: Texas Breaks Away
Texas and Mexico

Stephen F. Austin was the towering figure
in early Texas. When the level-headed Austin gave his endorsement
to the Texas revolution, the movement was legitimized in
the eyes of observers back in the United States.
Prints and Photographs Collection 1985/146-1.
|
At the very end of the Spanish regime
in Texas, the Spanish authorities had more or less destroyed the
small Spanish colonies in Texas. In no position to recruit new
Spanish settlers, spur economic development, or defend Texas from
the Indians, they conceived the idea of repopulating Texas with
Anglo-American colonists. According to the Spanish plan, the new
colonists would receive generous land grants in exchange for becoming
Spanish citizens, agreeing to join the Catholic Church, and investing
their own money and labor to develop and defend the country.
When Mexico took over in 1821, Mexican
authorities found themselves in the same boat as the Spanish:
they wanted to convert Texas from a dangerous liability to a safe
and civilized asset but lacked any means of doing so. They decided
to adopt the Spanish idea and farmed out the job to Anglo-American
empresarios, carefully screened businessmen and leaders who were
charged with managing all aspects of their colonies, from recruiting
and moving settlers to organizing militia to administering Mexican
laws.
Like other new frontiers before and after,
Texas was attractive to American settlers because of cheap land
prices (four cents for an acre of undeveloped land vs. $1.25 in
the United States) and the opportunity to escape debts or other
problems back home. Immigration was further stimulated in 1825
when President John Quincy Adams and Secretary of State Henry
Clay opened negotiations with Mexico to try to buy east Texas.
In the minds of many pioneers, it was only a matter of time before
their new home would be annexed to the United States and they
would be Americans once again.
By 1830, the American population of Texas
had grown to around 25,000 people, and Mexico was having second
thoughts. It realized that most of the colonists were drawn from
the same land-hungry frontier folk who had conquered the American
frontier in places like Kentucky and Tennessee. Indeed, Andrew
Jackson, the newly elected U.S. president who was a famous Tennessee
frontiersman and ardent expansionist, had just renewed the U.S.
offer to purchase Texas.

Andrew Jackson in 1828. Jackson would have
loved to preside over the annexation of Texas, but provided
little more than encouragement to the rebels. Courtesy of
The Hermitage.
|
Mexico had no intention of giving up its
northern province. Instead the Mexican government decided to forbid
further American immigration. To hold on to Texas, it decided
on a new tack of encouraging Mexican settlement and European immigration,
beefing up its military presence in Texas, and creating a strong
trade along the Texas coast. These new priorities were codified
as the Law of April 6, 1830.
The new policies seemed reasonable from
the Mexican point of view, and in any case they were not very
well enforced by the thinly stretched Mexican military and civil
authority. But Americans who had sacrificed everything to build
new lives in Texas were incensed by the Mexican restrictions and
attempts to collect tariffs and customs while still providing
no government services or protection against the Indians.
A series of incidents exploded like a
string of fireworks, each one bigger than the last. Each attempt
by Mexico to enforce its authority led to a meeting or small rebellion
by the Americans. Each act of civil disobedience led Mexico to
crack down harder. Events spun out of control, eventually resulting
in the legendary Texas
Revolution of 1836.
On the battlefield at San Jacinto,
Texas volunteers under General Sam Houston destroyed the Mexican
army. Texas independence had been won, but could it be kept? Would
Mexico regroup and take back control of its rebellious province?
Would the United States annex the territory as expansionists had
dreamed for decades? Would European powers like Britain or France
swoop in and grab off a chunk of North America for themselves?
Or would the impoverished backwater republic go its own way in
pursuit of new dreams of glory?
Part
1 continued: Alone in the Wilderness>> |